MaintenX — Thynkta

Screw Press P15 No.3

K2-PRS-16

CRITICAL

7Failures

31.5 hTotal downtime

4.5 hAvg repair

38 dBetween failures

Worn press coneClosed

M01-2026-0184

Mechanical ZAM · KIMI

Main shaft bearing seizedClosed

M01-2026-0121

Mechanical SYUKOR

OrdersVerifyHistoryAssets

ONE MACHINE'S RECORD

The question it answers

A mill is about a hundred machines that all have to run at once. Every one will break — that was never in question. What costs you is the question that comes after: what broke last time, and what did we do about it?

Before this, that answer lived in a paper logbook, a WhatsApp thread, or somebody's memory. None of them can be searched.

How a fault moves

Report A supervisor logs it from the mill floor — machine, what's wrong, mechanical or electrical. Under a minute.
Assign The foreman picks the crew. Tag it electrical and only certified chargemen appear.
Work The technician starts, then marks it done with notes on what was actually found.
Verify Someone else confirms it is genuinely fixed. The person who did the work cannot close their own job.

The part that matters

A chart, not a work log

My first attempt recorded work: log the fault, assign it, close it. A ticketing system with a maintenance vocabulary. That was wrong, and it took a while to see why.

Recording work tells you what your people did. It tells you nothing about your machines — and the machine is what stops production.

Every machine should have a chart. You open it and see what has gone wrong with this one, how often, and what was done — like a doctor pulling a patient's history before deciding anything.

Once you have that, something useful falls out for free. A screw press that used to fail every 38 days starts failing every 20. No single work order looks alarming. But the chart says it plainly, months before the machine strands you mid-season.

Decisions from the mill, not the code

Electrical work reaches a chargeman

That is competency, not preference. So when a fault is tagged electrical, only certified chargemen appear in the assignment list. The mistake stops being possible rather than being caught afterwards.

Two people on a hot job

We work in pairs for safety. A job can be assigned to two, and when it is assigned to one, that shows. Not to police anybody — but if you are recording who did the work anyway, you may as well be able to answer whether the buddy system was followed.

Nobody closes their own work

A technician submits; someone else verifies. That single separation is what makes the history worth trusting a year later.

Malay on the floor, English in the office

The alternative is a system half the crew quietly works around.

Where it runs

USERS 20 ASSETS 112 ROLE TIERS 4 STACK PWA · Firebase LANGUAGES BM · EN

Live at one Malaysian mill. No app store, no hardware, no IT project — it runs on the phones the crew already carry, and everyone signs in once.

See the full walkthrough →

Contact

If you run a mill and this sounds like your problem — akmalka97@gmail.com